# Logistic Regression and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator

## Article information

## Abstract

Logistic regression, a model that forms a binary dependent variable and one or more independent variable(s), is used especially in epidemiological studies. By understanding the logistic model and its applications, such as odds ratio (OR) and performance efficiency, the concept of logistic regression can be easily grasped. The purpose of this article is to 1) introduce logistic regression, including odds and OR, 2) present predictive efficiency, such as area under the curve, and 3) explain the caution of logistic regression analysis.

## INTRODUCTION

Regression analysis is a set of statistical processes used to estimate the relationship between a dependent variable (or outcome variable) and one or more independent variable(s). The most common form of regression analysis is linear regression, where the outcome variable is assumed to be continuous. In medical science, data are usually composed of two-level outcome variables (e.g., life or death, disease or no disease, pass or fail). Therefore, a linear statistical model would not be ideal, for several reasons. First, the predicted values for some covariate values are two-level outcomes (usually 0 or 1); therefore, using a standard linear regression for a bivariate outcome can produce very unsatisfactory results. Second, the assumption of constant variability of linear regression does not match the behavior of a bivariate outcome.1) To bridge this gap, logistic regression, which describes the relationship between a binary outcome and a set of independent variables, has been developed2) and explored because it reduces the potential bias resulting from differences in the groups being compared.3)

## ODDS, ODDS RATIO (OR), AND LOGISTIC REGRESSION

The odds of an event are the ratio of probability of an event occurring (denoted by *p*) divided by the probability of the event not occurring (denoted by 1−*p*). Since logistic regression calculates probability of an event occurring over the probability of the event not occurring, the impact of independent variables is usually explained in terms of odds. Using logistic regression, the mean of the response variable *p* in terms of an explanatory variable *x* is modeled, relating *p* and *x* through the equation *p*=*α*+*βx*.4) However, this would not be an appropriate model because extreme values of x in the equation *α* + *βx* may lead to a value that does not fall between 0 and 1. To overcome this problem, we transform the odds and use the natural logarithm of the odds as a regression function,5) as follows:

where *p* is the probability of the outcome variable and *x* is the independent variable. Suppose Y=1 when the event occurs, and Y=0 when the event does not occur. *α* is the intercept term, *β* represents the regression coefficient; the change in the logarithm of the odds of the event a 1-unit change in the predictor *x*, in other words, a 1-unit change in x is the ratio of the odds (OR). For example, the variable smoking relative was coded as 0 (no relative who smoked) or 1 (at least one relative who smoked) and the OR of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was 1.76. The meaning of odds in cases with at least one relative who smoked is 1.76 times higher than that in cases with non-smoking relatives. A useful way to remember the OR is “100 times the OR minus 1”. In this case, the OR of 1.76 is calculated as 100×(1.76−1)=76%; this means that the passive smoking group, where the participants have a relative who smokes, is at 76% higher risk of AMI than non-passive smoking group. The OR is sometimes confused with the relative risk (RR), which is the ratio of probability of an outcome in an exposed group to the probability of the outcome in an unexposed group. If the OR, without ignoring its meaning as a ratio of odds, is interpreted as RR, then this inaccuracy entails potentially serious problems.6) Using a two-by-two contingency table (Table 1), the formula of OR and RR have been proposed.

Mathematical formulas deduce the OR always overestimates the RR. Assuming that a disease is “rare” (below 10%), then OR is similar to the RR and can be considered a good approximation to the RR.3)

## APPLICATION AS A PREDICTIVE EFFICIENCY

A logistic model can be used to distinguish the observed cases from the observed non-cases. One approach for assessing such discriminatory performance involves using a fitted model to predict accuracy. If the fitted logistic model is made and the cut-off value (Cp) determined, then the predicted cases can be classified as *the cut-off value exceeds and the non-cases as the cut-off value does not exceed*. From the classification table (Table 2), sensitivity and specificity can be calculated as A/(A+C) and B/(B+D), respectively. Higher sensitivity and specificity indicate a better fit for the model.

Another approach involves plotting a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the fitted model and computing the area under the curve (AUC) as a measure of discriminatory performance. The ROC curve is defined as one minus specificity and the sensitivity as xand y-axes, respectively. Each point on the ROC curve represents a sensitivity/(1-specificity) pair corresponding to a particular decision threshold. The AUC is an integrated ROC curve and can indicate how much better the predictability of the logistic model is. A rough guide for grading AUC is as follows: excellent discrimination for 0.9–1.0, good discrimination for 0.8–0.9, fair discrimination for 0.7–0.8, poor discrimination for 0.6–0.7, and failed discrimination for 0.5–0.6.

## CONSIDERATION OF SAMPLE SIZE AND SPARSE DATA

The simple linear regression model is represented as follows:

where *β _{0}* is the intercept and

*β*is the coefficient. The goal of the linear regression is to find the best-fit line that can accurately predict the output for the continuous variable and whether independent variables are single or multiple. Before making a regression model, the assumptions of the regression model (outlined in Table 3) will be considered.

_{1}In logistic regression, no assumption is needed, unlike in linear regression. However, longitudinal data should be considered for analysis in the logistic form, otherwise it would lead to problems with estimation. One consideration for analyzing logistic regression is sample size. The recommended sample size for employing logistic regression can be greater than 4002) because a small sample size overestimates the effect measure. In practice, small sample size is possible given the following “one in ten rule. One predictive variable can be studied for every ten events.7) Another consideration is that a small sample or sparse event dataset, which estimates odds ratios, may be biased.8) To address the problem, several methods are available to improve accuracy, including exact logistic regression,9) Firth's penalized likelihood approach,10) Cauchy priors,11) data augmentation priors,12) and Ridge and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator method.13)14)

## CONCLUSION

The logistic regression model is a powerful tool for epidemiologic studies, although with some substantial shortcomings in the use and reporting of logistic regression results noted. Therefore, careful model selection and interpretation is warranted. The extended logistic regression model is widely used. In this paper, I have discussed only a binary logistic regression model; nevertheless, there are extensions to the logistic regression models that allow analysis of outcomes with more than three-ordered levels (for instance, no, moderate, or severe pain). A multinomial logistic regression model can be applied with the proportional odds logistic regression method,15) although some other models are equally applicable.16)17) The standard logistic regression model presumes that observations are independent. In longitudinal or clustered data, observations are not independent, and assuming they are independent can lead to misleading conclusions.18) Therefore, it is appropriate to use generalized estimating equations19) and random effects model in these cases.20)

## Notes

**Conflict of Interest**

The author has no financial conflicts of interest.

**Author Contributions**

Conceptualization: Lee H, Kim HS; Formal analysis: Kim HS; Methodology: Lee H; Supervision: Kim HS; Writing - original draft: Lee H, Kim HS; Writing - review & editing: Lee H, Kim HS.